 |
 |
| 1 |
1. Introducing the use
of email using your pseudonym. 2. Swaping roles half way through the
event so the players gets a chance to look at the issues from both
sides and further test their skills.
|
| 2 |
As
above.
|
| 3 |
I need to know what was
in michael's head when he set this up. It was good to experience
this from a participant's point of view but i need to see it from a
facilitators point of view. Perhaps this would be possible if the
facilitator kept a log as the roleplay evolved from conception
though implmentation that we could then examine.
|
| 4 |
Maybe more props.
on-line map, fake zoning info etc.
|
| 5 |
Maybe a formalised
meeting where the people in the group actually vote in a chat
session as to whether the development goes ahead. This would be a
conclusion to the activity.
|
| 6 |
I reckon their should be
an impartial judge..possibly the facilitator or one of the students
who is assigned the Planning Commission's Role. THey have the final
say. Could be cool...more like the real thing?
|
| 7 |
Some people need to
realise this is just that a role play and unfortunately some of
their dare I say it - I suspect 'personalities' came
through.
|
